dcsimg
 
 
 

Connecting the Compaign: How the Democrats Built Their Network

 
 
 
 
 
 

Volunteers who interact with the Obama campaign through a Web browser may never know it, but the system that drives their efforts is the product of an intense development and integration project that was far from complete as the 2008 campaign began. The heart of this network is housed in a Boston-area data center, where scores of workstations run voter-file databases and related software. The facility has multiple connections to Internet backbones to ensure maximum uptime.

The voter files come from state Democratic parties and the Democratic National Committee, which have been amassing them for years. Previous campaigns were hampered by a lack of easy access to these files, and as recently as the 2006 elections, vital information was still stored in numerous independent, siloed databases. "For this cycle, the DNC was focused on integration and efficiencies," says Jim St. George, a principal at Voter Activation Network, or VAN, the company that handled the back-end integration job.

The VAN system has been in the making for seven years; it runs on commercially-available database software and is descended from a project begun in 2001 for Iowa Senator Tom Harkin, who was headed into a reelection campaign. One of VAN's big jobs was engineering the databases so that campaigns can slice and dice the lists with great efficiency. "It sounds easy, like something you could do with Microsoft Access," St. George says. "But if you have 12 million names and you want to find 30,000 women in a particular age group who voted in two particular elections but not a third one, it's going to take a long time."

As volunteers and staffers in the field enter information into the system about their interactions with possible voters, staffers at local, state, and national campaign headquarters can see what's happening on ground, and make adjustments on the fly. They might decide to send out a mailer to wavering voters, for example. "All the data feeds into the same database, and the data gets better as you go along," St. George says. But the set-up isn't intended to create top-down management. St. George says a key difference between the Obama network and the successful Bush/Cheney '04 micro-targeting-and-e-mail strategy is mass collaboration. Granting significant local authority on campaign activities to young staffers and volunteers means mistakes can happen, but the idea is that overall decision-making should be better than with centrally-planned activities. While unwilling to provide specifics, St. George promises that additional turnout-maximization features will be in place on Election Day.

VAN's partner on the big integration project was another Boston-area company, Blue State Digital, which was founded by veterans of the Dean campaign. Blue State built the front end of the system, connecting the ground operations with the VAN databases. "This thing is absolutely huge," says Jascha Franklin-Hodge, a partner at Blue State. Virtual phone-banking tools built by Blue State allowed Obama volunteers and staff to make over 2 million phone calls to likely voters during the primary season--and that, says Franklin-Hodge, was done with an older generation of the phone-list tools. "People can spend half an hour on the phone after work," he says. "It allows a campaign to have direct voter-to-voter contact at Internet scale."

Part of the power of MyBarackObama.com is that it capitalizes on the path-breaking success of popular social networking sites like Facebook and MySpace. While Krohn says the RNC has enjoyed success in using these established sites to activate motivated volunteers, MyBO does things they cannot. "Facebook was the gateway," Trippi says. Adds Franklin-Hodge, "Facebook is great for broadcasting yourself to friends, but it's not very action oriented. There are few features at MyBO for broadcasting yourself in the abstract--instead it's geared to getting people to take action." In essence, MyBO redirects the energy of social networkers to specific, campaign-oriented tasks, such as canvassing neighborhoods. Ruffini agrees that the system has "morphed into a very useful tool." A killer application, he says, is the group-building feature, which allows people to create connections to potential voters in their area, rather than just talking about their personal views of the campaign as they might on Facebook.

Of course, user excitement still matters. As Adamson says, "The technology wouldn't be any good if you didn't have people enthusiastic enough to use it."

Part One: The Ground Game: Open Source vs Closed. Part Two: Local Area Networks: How the Obama Campaign Works on the Ground.

Part Four: Going Mobile: Texting and Twittering in the New Ground Game.

 
 
 
 

3 Comments for "Connecting the Compaign: How the Democrats Built Their Network"

  • Jehangir August 27, 2013 12:05 pm

    Short, sweet, to the point, FRaExe-Ectly as information should be!

  • Gene Koo October 03, 2008 12:18 pm

    Any grassroots organizer (even the ones who have fewer responsibilities than mayors) will tell you that databases are the root of all organizing. They may not use the word "database," but back in the day, organizers took special care of their stacks of index cards with supporters' key info. The key point made at the end of this piece is distinguishing between a typical networking site and a campaign site: Facebook et.al. encourage socializing, not action. The pyramid structure and action-bias of MyBO is impressive; I am waiting to see if the iPhone app will allow the campaign to push reminders to volunteers the same way that organizers do turnout calls or other tactics to ensure that people show up to phonebank or canvass.

  • Craig Kensek October 01, 2008 4:35 pm

    I'm impressed with the obama website with respect to how it can let volunteers look for opportunities by state, do some research on issues, etc. It also does a good job explaining how a volunteer can do some grassroots efforts and set up events of their own. It even tracks the volunteer's activities. The devil is in the details. Once on the list, volunteers get one or more emails a day providing some sort of update and/or asking for "another" donation. Also, volunteers were getting emails addressed to Dear "first name" - whoops. Sometimes it is the little things.

Leave a Comment